by Tycho » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:17 pm
Just realized you have a 97/98 frame which means a 6.75" rear shock. This means your only other option is the Cane Creek Cloud 9. No one else currently manufactures a 6.75" shock.
The Alps 5R is a terrific shock in my opinion tho. I remember first riding my friend's '97 Race back when I had a '96 Y11. I had a Mantra within a month of that ride. The Alps has a little higher seal friction than the newer air shocks, but is still widely adjustable, very linear for an air shock, and has good speed sensitivity characteristics on the compression stroke (shim stack compression damping, orifice rebound circuit). It's not nitrogen charged which means you can service it yourself, burp the oil chamber if necessary, change oil weights, and the lower internal pressures make it less prone to seal failure as well. I've had some spare negative pistons made recently (this is the oil/air separator) for a TMA reader who had his 5R fail and couldn't find a replacement shock in the correct length, so if you ever have the oil mixing with the air in a big way I can take care of that.
Mantras ride nice with a taller front end. On my '97 comp frame I ran a Psylo (120mm travel) for several years, then put a Fox Vanilla 125r on the front end of my '01 Carbon Mantra and now have a 2006 RS Revelation (130 mm travel). Making the front end taller mellows out the steering characteristics, which makes it a bit more difficult to pick your way through super gnarly uphill singletrack (something the Mantra excells at due to its quick handling and massive amount of rear travel and traction), but it makes the bike FAR more comfortable at high speeds down steeper hills (especially given how much the rear end can lift under braking due to the amount of sag that should be run in the rear). Going from a 3 to 5" fork slackens the headtube by probably 1.5 degrees or so.
On my Carbon Mantra, I run the seat all the way back on the rails and have a relatively short stem. I run about 1/3 total travel sag on the rear and run higher negative spring pressure than positive pressure on the fork (5" fork that sits down about 3/4" into its travel before I get on the bike). With the Helix I can run a lot of sag by lowering spring preload, but prevent bottoming by running high air chamber pressure. With this setup I have found the bike to be quite agile because I never have much weight on the front, and with the front fork so soft, it continues to track the ground very well (lots of traction, not much "weight" for the front tire to redirect when I do turn). Much of the steering is done simply by shifting my weight and "setting" the front end in the direction I want it to go. Wide tires (2.35s or wider) with gnarly side lugs let you lay the bike over in turns which also makes up for any loss of quickness due to head tube slackening. Oh, all that sag in the rear makes the bike incredibly stable too.
For an XC setup, a new 100 mm SID would probably be just about perfect.